Statistics of Reliability
A common method of estimating parameters related to component (system)
reliability is that of life testing. This consists of selecting a random
sample of n components, testing them under specific environmental
conditions, and observing the time to failure of each component.
The following examples are drawn from the blue book.
Example 10.7
Assume that the time to failure, X, of a telehone switching system
exponentially distributed with a failure rate
.
We wish to estimate the failure rate
from a
random sample of n times to failure. Then the likelihood function is:

from which we get the maximum-likelihood estimator of the failure rate to be
the reciprocal of the sample mean:

The corresponding maximum-likelihood estimator of the mean life (MTTF) is
equal to the sample mean
.
Usually, the MTTF (mean time to failure) is so large as to forbid such
exhaustive life tests; hence truncated (censored) life tests are
common. Such a life test is terminated after the first r failures
have occured (sample-truncated, or type II) or after a specific time has
elapsed (time-truncated, or type I).
Example 10.9
Consider a sample truncated etst of n components without replacement. Let
T1,
T2,
. . .,
Tr
be the observed times to failure so that
T1
T2
...
Tr.
Specific values of these random variables are denoted by
t1
t2
...
tr.
Let
be the MTTF to be estimated and assume that components follow an exponential
failure law.
Since (n-r) componenets have not failed when the test is completed, the
likelihood function is defined in the following way. Assume
Tr+1, . . . , Tn are the times to failure
of the remaining components, whose failures will not actually be observed.
Then

and, dividing by the product of
hi's
and taking the limit as
hi ->0, we get

Let

be the accumulated life on the test. Differentiating the likelihood function
with respect to
and setting it equal to zero, we get

Then the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) of the mean life is given by

Thus the estimator of the mean life is given by the accumulated life on
test, Sn ; r, divided by the number of observed
failures.
Example 10.19
Assume that n = 50 chips are placed on a life test without replacement
and the test is to be truncated after r = 10 failures have been observed.
Observed failure times are
t1 = 80,
t2 = 95,
t3 = 370,
t4 = 415,
t5 = 590,
t6 = 635,
t7 = 835,
t8 = 895,
t9 = 895,
t10 = 960 h. Then
Sn;r
= (80 + 95 +370 + 415 + 505 + 590 + 635 + 835 + 895 + 960) + (50 - 10)960
= 43,780 h.
The estimated mean life is
= 43780/10 = 4378 h, and the estimated failure
rate is
= 0.0002284 failures per hour. Finally, a 90% confidence interval for mean life
is

or
2787 <
< 8069 h,
where
= 31.410 and
= 10.851
values are obtained from a table of
chi-square distributions with 20 degrees of freedom.
Recalling that the interevent times of a Poisson process are exponentially
distributed, we can obtain a confidence interval for the average rate.
Assume that a Poisson process of rate
is
observed until a fixed number n of events have been counted. Let
Xi denote the time between the (i-1)st and the
ith event. Then Xi is exponentially distributed with
parameter
, and the statistic

is n-stage Elrang with parameter
. It
follows that 2
Sn is chi-square
distributed with 2n degrees of freedom. Consequently

is a confidence interval for
, with confidence
coefficient (1-
). Sometimes a one-sided
confidence interval is sought in place of the two-sided interval given above.
For example, an upper one-sided confidence interval of the mean life
is denoted by
(
L,
) where
L is known as the
lower confidence limit. Since
2Sn ; r chi-square distributed with
2r degrees of freedom, we have

It follows that

Similarly, a lower one-sided confidence interval of the mean life is
denoted by (0,
U), where a value of
the upper confidence limit
U is
given by

Example 4
We note that for a chi-square distribution with 2r = 20 degrees of
freedom,
=
= 28.41 and
=
= 12.443.
It follows that the 90% lower confidence limit of the mean life is given by

Therefore, with 90% confidence we can assert taht the true mean life is greater
than 2082 h. The 90% upper confidence limit is

Therefore, with 90% confidence we can assert that the true mean life is less
than 7036 h.
For ultra-high-reliability systems, the mean life may be much larger than the
duration of a normal "mission." In this case we are more interested in
obtaining a confidence interval for ssytem reliability given a mission time
t. We proceed to derive such a confidence interval starting from the
100(1-
)% upper one-sided confidence of the mean
life
.
Thus

(since the exponential is a monotonic function)

In other words

is the lower 100(1-
)% confidence limit for the
reliability for the reliability, given a mission time t. Note that
the chi-square distribution here has 2r degrees of freedom, since we
are discussing a test, without replacement, truncated after r failures.
Many more examples of statistics of reliability can be found in chapters 10 and 11 of the blue book.